Saturday, November 2, 2024
HomeViewpointsColumnsFirst presidential debate exactly as advertised

First presidential debate exactly as advertised

The first presidential debate of the 2016 election was billed as possibly the most momentous evening in American politics and it certainly delivered in some sense.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton faced off in the first of a series of three such sparring matches scheduled for this fall, attacking each other on past statements and policies. The debate was theoretically moderated by NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt; however, his presence in the debate, save for a few rare moments, essentially amounted to attempting to reassert control over the proceedings only to be ignored.

Trump began the debate in a surprisingly lethargic manner, and for the first half of the debate could be heard loudly sniffling into the microphone during his speeches. However, as the debate wore on, he began to pick up steam, eventually morphing into the same loud, outspoken persona that won him the nomination. Meanwhile, Clinton remained more or less constant in her tone and temperament throughout.

So who won the debate?

The debate began with a discussion of economics, which was clearly Trump’s strong point. The two candidates were more or less even on this front, with Trump citing Clinton’s support of the ineffective North American Free Trade Agreement and Clinton attacking Trump’s apparent support of “trickle-down” economic policies.

However, from there the debate moved onto the topic of race, and from there Clinton only gained momentum. As the two discussed topics including cybersecurity, ISIS and international relations, Clinton proved herself more than capable of ignoring Trump’s attempts to derail her arguments. In several cases, she was able to bait Trump into undertaking long, incoherent rants against the state of the country.

While Clinton’s own performance was only middling at best–she missed several opportunities to utilize lines of attack gifted to her by Trump’s rambling rhetoric, while also leaving herself open to attack too often–she was leaps and bounds ahead of her opponent, who at times looked as though he had no idea what he was doing. Clinton may be a highly divisive figure, but at the very least she understands the importance of civility and proper debate practice. As such, it seems clear that Clinton came out of the debate the indisputable victor.

The next debate will be held in St. Louis in just under two weeks. If Trump hopes to regain the momentum he has lost, he will need to make significant strides toward refining his debate style.

Image Credit: Zachary Robinson

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Justin Glover
Justin Glover
Justin Glover is Executive Editor of The Pacer. He is a senior Communications major. Among other things, he enjoys sports, writing and talking in third person.
RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Stephen Yeargin on About
Colby Anderson on About
Charles E. Coleman on About
Jeanna Jordan on God’s chosen Cowboy
Josh Lemons, former PacerEE on Trotting back to Martin
Tiffany Griffin on Trotting back to Martin
Laura Crossett on Advertising
Jennifer on Advertising
Marcus Allen Wakefield on DC vs. Marvel: The fight everyone wins
Concerned UTM Alum on Pacer addresses YOUniversity issues
Alex Wilson - Former SGA President on Pacer addresses YOUniversity issues
Chris Morris (Pledge Trainer) on UTM ATO chapter to close
Recent Alumnus on Voice It!: ATO closes at UTM
Anonymous 2 on UTM ATO chapter to close
Chris Morris (Pledge Trainer) on UTM ATO chapter to close
Otis Glazebrook on Voice It!: ATO closes at UTM
Jim bob tucker on UTM ATO chapter to close
Jennifer Witherspoon on Student remembered, celebrated for life
Samantha Drewry on Two killed in motorcycle crash
Anecia Ann Price on … and in with the new